The International Academy Of Anabiology
Academy Started in 1998. This Web Started on June 30, 2004
The word "anabiosis" can be found in most good dictionaries. Here is a standard definition.
A restoring to life from a deathlike condition; resuscitation. (source)
 The word "anabiology" is a new word, not previously found in dictionaries; it is a word created by Karl Loren. It is derived from the word "anabiosis" as defined above. This new word, "anabiology" would mean, with some slight additions simply, the "study of" or the "science of" the "restoring to life from a deathlike condition to a previous state of health."
The International Academy is founded by "Bonnie J. Troescher, also known as "Jean Ross," wife of Loren C. Troescher, also known as "Karl Loren. 
As the remainder of the name suggests, this "Academy" expects to TEACH on and about the subject of "restoring to life from a deathlike condition to a previous state of health."
This Academy is "International" because it expects to include "Teachers" and students from all over Earth.
The image above, of Karl in a desert-setting, may suggest that he is the source of certain wisdom? Perhaps, but more appropriately that image (suggesting "Socrates") portrays a "method" of "Socratic Teaching" that will be and is the hallmark of this Foundation.
You'll recogonize the two main subjects of the Academy, being bio-chemistry and bio-physics.
Neither of those two "well-known" subjects has any validity amongst the 99.9% of any group claiming to have any knowledge in them, simply because the "bio" part of both terms means "life," and there are extremely few scientists on the planet today who have a useful understanding of "life."
Also "biochemistry" has evolved into a subject where those who claim its title have directed the attention of their study ever "downward" into more and more specialization. Thus, it is not enough to be an "expert" on the "life-chemistry" of dogs instead of cats, but only when you are an expert in the left front paw of a species of dog can you claim sufficient specialization to be a true "expert."
The "anabiolgist" is a generalist. This simple statement contains the core of the concept and will not be grasped by many.
The anabiolgist does NOT go to medical school to learn anabiology.
He practices and demonstrates competence in dozens of fields showing his skill at observing and learning broadly rather than narrowly.
I, Karl Loren, do understand "life!" And I have had the widest possible training and experience, certainly to EXCLUDE medical school where the proportion of false information taught to true data taught is very much in favor of the false.
I am not humble about this.
The meaning of "anabiology" is further described to say that, usually, the most healthy a person has been in his whole life is somewhere around the age of 18 or 20, or so. Obviously there are many variations.
 One of the most obvious changes from the age of 18 to the age of 74 (my age) is in physical ability, range of motion, balance, and a host of simple physical factors.
Anabiology does not demand that you ARRIVE at a previous state of health, but that you are making steady (measurable) progress toward that state. I am doing that in at least one unusual realm -- check me out at www.karllorenkungfu.com to see how I'm doing physically.
I have a world of "secrets" to unfold for those interested in the "tr ue" bio-physics as I will be explaining them.
In terms of "bio-chemistry," there too I am ahead of 99% of the planet's scientific population. You note that I am not one bit humble. Check the as yet very much incomplete account of the spectacular "bio-chemical" results I have experienced personally, during 2005. My cure of my wife's esophagus cancer (see below) is in the same vein as the material you'll find at the above link. There are currently NO BOOKS which usefully teach the subject of biochemistry.
Much of what I shall be writing will appear on my new premium (for fee) web site, called www.karllorenpremium.com . Articles of truth will be published both HERE and THERE.
We "teach by asking." The questions will be powerful and incisive -- many the balloon do we intend to "prick" among the rigid thinkers of old ways. I have already developed innovative new electronic educational techniques which you'll be seeing -- indeed.
There is another whole different aspect to anabiology -- the spiritual. I carefully do NOT preach any religion here, but call on you to recognize that there is no gain in physical health that is not monitored by your spiritual condition. Again, I understand that phrase -- and while you will not learn about the spirit here, you may learn whether YOUR spiritual understanding is sufficient to allow you to achieve the gains from anabiology that are possible.
The image of Bonnie, on the right, was taken in February, 2004, one day after she was given the diagnosis of "cancer of the esophagus."
 The picture below, on the left, was taken June 30, 2004, about one week after Bonnie decided to enter a Hospice and die. The picture on the left was taken on the day of the Thirtieth Wedding Anniversary of Bonnie and Loren, or Jean and Karl, as they are well-known to their thousands of friends on the web.
There is a remarkable journey between these two dates, between these two images. That story has been chronicled and actually published every step of the way, and the final chapters are reserved for presentation on THIS web site.
The actual remedies we used are these:
Germanium -- increased quantities in the water used for her feeding tube. This one remedy is the one used most consistently during several months. Bonnie has taken as much as 12 grams per day and probably never fell below 3 grams on any one day all through radiation and chemotherapy.
-
Gravison (and Graviola) South American herbals -- one kills cancer cells and one eats them -- both are very effective.
-
Acidophilus -- absolutely necessary to handle "bloat" and the resulting terrible pain -- just gas, but so discouraging when it "won't go away." It DOES go away -- easily.
-
Transfer Factor Plus
-
Liquid Vitamin B
-
Potassium liquid
-
Mega Mineral liquid
-
a new product, "Aloe Immune" (see here and here about that one)
-
Taheebo Tea (powder -- open the capsules -- in tube) This has been one of the most consistent -- and the one I have most experience with. Vital.
-
Oxygen Essentials Plus (liquid)
-
Silica
Much more will be published starting here. For a contrasting image, take a look at Jean Ross, one year later, in her Kung Fu class! Or, click here to watch an hour of Kung Fu exercise class, including Jean and several others.
The Academy expects to have a very close working relationship with the Church of Compassionate Service.
The Academy has as its first task the preparation and submission of the proper documents to attain approval from the Internal Revenue Service of its non-profit status.
These pages will be filled with related information, particularly on the research and findings related to the purpose implicit in the name "Anabiology."
Do visit again. More is to be added -- indeed! Jean's Journey continues HERE.
This web site is the main public face for a non-profit private foundation whose purposes include research and teaching.
The "research" is going to be along "health lines" but very much also oriented toward the "morals of the health practices" we research.
 For instance, when Bonnie had to make the big decision between "conventional treatment" versus "alternative therapies," it was not a simple decision. For some 25 years she and I had been intensely involved with the "alternative therapy" world. I've published many thousands of pages, for instance, about the harmfulness and fruitless results of chemotherapy and radiation.
Yet, she chose that route, and I supported her decision. That story is fully presented in the hundreds of pages about this journey on other web sites.
But the issue I want to describe here is this:
Early on we were discussing with the radiation doctor the forthcoming treatment and I asked what were the likely chances of survival for her (esophagus) cancer. He confirmed what I have found on the web -- about 20% chance of survival after two years!
The question which came to me -- I thought an extremely logical question, was, "What are the characteristics of that 20% that survived for two years?"
Could all those 20% be "vegetarians?" Or, Asian? Or never drank coffee? Or, what? It would seem rather easy to do some very simple data collection, even from autopsies, if necessary for those who died after THREE years, even without ever getting a person's name or other confidential information.
I was astounded when the radiation doctor admitted that he had never even heard of such a study being done!
Why?
Well, not only will THIS Foundation look much further into this, but we will examine what might be the "ethics and morals structure" of the "medical industry" involved in treating cancer.
We heard, over and over, that the "proposed treatment" (of both chemo and radiation) was the "best that had been found. Well, if 80% of the patients who got this best treatment were dead after two years, wouldn't it be worth looking at those 20% who remained alive?
Is there a possibility that the "drug industry" has gotten these standard treatments so ingrained into the teaching hospitals, and doctors' "rules" that the 20% are the aberration and only the 80% are the standard of care?
So this Foundation is interested in the health issues involved in investigation of what might be the common characteristics of those 20% who survived, but much more interested in WHY there has been so apparent little interest in studying those survivors, or conveying the results of any such studies to doctors like our radiation doctor.
If that doctor had told us that, "Yes, studies show that the 20% who survive all drank Coke, not Pepsi!" don't you think we would switch to Coke!!!
So, this is a Foundation that pursues research related to the morality of health care.
Here is another example. I am no slouch when it comes to analyzing fairly technical material, including about cancer. CLICK HERE for an analysis I did of a conventional (drug company supported) research report explaining the cause of metastasis. I believe I tore that report to shreds, showing that the writers were ignoring very commonly available data that must be taken into account.
So, there is also a lack of morality on the research side of cancer care and finally, who do you think supplies the grants for research? The drug companies do almost all of it.
Do you think there is any chance several drug companies will read these pages and decide that the International Academy of Anabiology should receive funding for its research?
I don't think so.
Instead, this is a "private," non-profit Foundation because I believe that the sources of financing this Foundation are going to be private donors -- not government or the cancer industry.
Finally
|
